Skip to main content

From Adaptive Business Processes to Orchestrated Microflows

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1017 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 391))

Abstract

Nowadays, businesses with focus on consumer-products are challenged by short production cycles, high pricing pressure, and the need to deliver new features and services in a regular interval. Currently, businesses are tackling these challenges by automating their business processes, while yet trying to be flexible by introducing methods for process variability modeling. However, for larger processes and variability models, it becomes difficult to consider, maintain, and optimize all process variations in the various execution contexts. In software development, highly agile requirements are usually tackled with a flexible microservice architecture. Nonetheless, the fast-changing service landscape is often not fully reflected in the underlying business processes, leading to inefficiency and loss of profit. With this work, we extend our framework for process variability modeling with concepts of Microflows, allowing agile business process modeling and orchestration while utilizing the full flexibility of underlying microservices. In addition, we present a case study, showing how this approach is used in the context of an IoT application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Xia, F., Yang, L.T., Wang, L., Vinel, A.: Internet of things. Int. J. Commun. Syst. 25(9), 1101–1102 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sinnhofer, A.D., et al.: Combining business process variability and software variability using traceable links. In: Shishkov, B. (ed.) Bus. Model. Softw. Des., pp. 67–86. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78428-1_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. WFMC: Workflow Management Coalition Terminology and Glossary (WFMC-TC-1011). Technical report, Workflow Management Coalition, Brussels (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Saidani, O., Nurcan, S.: Towards context aware business process modelling. In: 8th Workshop on Business Process Modeling, Development, and Support, BPMDS 2007, CAiSE, vol. 7, p. 1 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Oberhauser, R., Stigler, S.: Microflows: leveraging process mining and an automated constraint recommender for microflow modeling. In: Shishkov, B. (ed.) Bus. Model. Softw. Des., pp. 25–48. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78428-1_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Lewis, J., Fowler, M.: Microservices. IEEE Softw. 32(1), 116 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bouguettaya, A., Sheng, Q.Z., Daniel, F. (eds.): Web Services Foundations. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7518-7

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Sinnhofer, A.D., Pühringer, P., Potzmader, K., Orthacker, C., Steger, C., Kreiner, C.: Software configuration based on order processes. In: Shishkov, B. (ed.) BMSD 2016. LNBIP, vol. 275, pp. 200–220. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57222-2_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Pohl, K., Böckle, G., van der Linden, F.J.: Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations Principles and Techniques. Springer, New York (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28901-1

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Sinnhofer, A.D., Oppermann, F.J., Potzmader, K., Orthacker, C., Steger, C., Kreiner, C.: Increasing the visibility of requirements based on combined variability management. In: Shishkov, B. (ed.) Bus. Model. Softw. Des., pp. 203–220. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94214-8_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Sinnhofer, A.D., Pühringer, P., Kreiner, C.: Varbpm – a product line for creating business process model variants. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Business Modeling and Software Design - Volume 1: BMSD 2015, pp. 184–191 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Oberhauser, R.: Microflows: automated planning and enactment of dynamic workflows comprising semantically-annotated microservices. In: Shishkov, B. (ed.) Bus. Model. Softw. Des., pp. 183–199. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57222-2_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. IBM: IBM business process manager 8.6.0 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sheng, Q., Qiao, X., Vasilakos, A., Szabo, C., Bourne, S., Xu, X.: Web services composition: a decade’s overview. Inf. Sci. 280, 218–238 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rajasekar, A., Wan, M., Moore, R., Schroeder, W.: Micro-services: a service-oriented paradigm for scalable, distributed data management. In: Kosar, T. (ed.) Data Intensive Distributed Computing: Challenges and Solutions for Large-scale Information Management. IGI Global, Hershey (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rao, J., Su, X.: A survey of automated web service composition methods. In: Cardoso, J., Sheth, A. (eds.) SWSWPC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3387, pp. 43–54. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30581-1_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosa, M.L., Aalst, W.M.P.V.D., Dumas, M., Milani, F.P.: Business process variability modeling: a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 50(1), 2:1–2:45 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Derguech, W.: Towards a framework for business process models reuse. In: The CAiSE Doctoral Consortium (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gimenes, I., Fantinato, M., Toledo, M.: A product line for business process management. In: International Software Product Line Conference, pp. 265–274 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hallerbach, A., Bauer, T., Reichert, M.: Guaranteeing soundness of configurable process variants in provop. In: IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing, CEC 2009, pp. 98–105. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hallerbach, A., Bauer, T., Reichert, M.: Issues in modeling process variants with Provop. In: Ardagna, D., Mecella, M., Yang, J. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNBIP, vol. 17, pp. 56–67. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00328-8_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Reichert, M., Hallerbach, A., Bauer, T.: Lifecycle support for business process variants. In: vom Brocke, J., Rosemann, M. (eds.) Handbook on Business Process Management 1. Introduction, Methods and Information Systems. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45100-3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Gottschalk, F., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Jansen-Vullers, M.H., La Rosa, M.: Configurable workflow models. Int. J. Cooper. Inf. Syst. 17, 177–221 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. La Rosa, M., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Mendling, J., Gottschalk, F.: Beyond control-flow: extending business process configuration to roles and objects. In: Li, Q., Spaccapietra, S., Yu, E., Olivé, A. (eds.) ER 2008. LNCS, vol. 5231, pp. 199–215. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87877-3_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Haugen, O., Wasowski, A., Czarnecki, K.: Cvl: common variability language. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Software Product Line Conference, SPLC 2013 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhao, X., Zou, Y.: A business process-driven approach for generating software modules. Softw. Pract. Exp. 41(10), 1049–1071 (2011)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Sinnhofer, A.D., Pühringer, P., Potzmader, K., Orthacker, C., Steger, C., Kreiner, C.: A framework for process driven software configuration. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Business Modeling and Software Design - Volume 1: BMSD 2016, pp. 196–203 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Weiss, D.M., Lai, C.T.R.: Software Product-line Engineering: A Family-based Software Development Process. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co. Inc, Boston (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hammer, M., Champy, J.: Reengineering the Corporation - A Manifesto For Business Revolution. Harper Business, New York (1993)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Österle, H.: Business Engineering - Prozess- und Systementwicklung. Springer, Heidelberg (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61437-8

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. OMG: Business process model and notation (BPMN) version 2.0 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sinnhofer, A.D., Höller, A., Pühringer, P., Potzmader, K., Orthacker, C., Steger, C., Kreiner, C.: Combined variability management of business processes and software architectures. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Business Modeling and Software Design - Volume 1: BMSD, INSTICC, pp. 36–45. SciTePress (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The project is funded by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Daniel Sinnhofer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sinnhofer, A.D., Oberhauser, R., Steger, C. (2020). From Adaptive Business Processes to Orchestrated Microflows. In: Shishkov, B. (eds) Business Modeling and Software Design. BMSD 2020. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 391. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52306-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52306-0_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-52305-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-52306-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics